NIRF 2025 Data
Let's explore what India's official ranking data is actually telling us about IITM — and what it means for you as someone considering studying here. Numbers compared across the 7 older IITs.
Who's in the room with you
How many students enter each year, where they come from, and what the gender split looks like. A campus is only as interesting as the people on it — and NIRF gives us hard numbers on exactly this.
| Metric | IITM | IITB | IITD | IITK | IITKgp | IITR | IITG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTech intake (2023-24) |
961 | 1,161 | 1,113 | 1,210 | 1,260 | 1,100 | 1,009 |
Dual Degree intake (2023-24) 5-yr BTech + MTech integrated |
93 | 80 | 116 | — | 648 | 30 | — |
Total BTech enrolled (all years) |
3,589 | 5,164 | 4,337 | 4,716 | 4,096 | 4,462 | 3,914 |
Female students (BTech) |
765 (21%) | 994 (19%) | 898 (21%) | 956 (20%) | 740 (18%) | 899 (20%) | 830 (21%) |
Students from outside home state |
81% | 71% | 90% | 78% | 86% | 98% | 96% |
Why your resume will look different after 4 years
NIRF collects the total value of research and industry projects at each IIT — a direct measure of how much real, funded work is happening on campus. This shapes what opportunities exist for students far more than any ranking number.
| Metric (2023-24) | IITM | IITB | IITD | IITK | IITKgp | IITR | IITG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total project funding (₹ Cr) research + industry combined |
₹1,366 | ₹724 | ₹420 | ₹339 | ₹208 | ₹247 | ₹185 |
Total active projects research + industry combined |
2,361 | 2,846 | 1,540 | 1,610 | 1,232 | 1,355 | 714 |
₹1,366 crore in active research and industry projects isn't a trophy number — it's 2,361 live projects running on campus at the time of reporting. For a UG student, that means there is always a professor with a funded, real problem who needs smart undergraduates to help solve it. BTP (Bachelor Thesis Projects), summer research fellowships, lab roles, and industry collaborations all emerge from this ecosystem. Students who lean into this leave with publications, patents, and recommendation letters that describe actual technical contributions — not just grades. Maybe even a startup?
IITM leads all 7 older IITs on total project funding by a significant margin. The nearest peer, IITB, has ₹724 Cr — about half of IITM's figure. This reflects the depth and scale of IITM's relationships with government agencies, PSUs, and private industry built through its Research Park over decades.
PG and PhD students benefit most directly — project assistantships, stipends, and authorship. But UG students are not left out. Professors routinely pull in motivated undergrads. You have to seek it out — it doesn't land in your lap — but the opportunity is genuinely there.
What happens after you leave
NIRF collects campus placement outcomes — the number of students placed through institute-run drives, median salary, and the number who chose higher studies. Here's what the data shows, and how to read it correctly.
"77% placed" looks moderate — until you add context. Another 21% of graduating BTech students deliberately chose higher studies (MS abroad, MTech, PhD) over campus placement. Add them together and the productive outcome rate is 98% — essentially every student. The placement percentage looks lower than some peers not because IITM graduates struggle, but because a large, intentional fraction opts out of campus drives entirely.
The ₹17.5L median is the campus-drive floor. It excludes off-campus offers, startup roles, research fellowships at top institutions, and positions at organisations that recruit directly. Package distributions are wide, and some students deliberately choose lower-paying paths for specific career reasons.
The data shows Dual Degree students have a higher placement rate (88% vs 77%) — but this comparison is misleading. Dual Degree students already graduate with a master's degree, so far fewer of them go on to further studies. Of course more of them show up for campus placements. The median salary difference (₹19.4L vs ₹17.5L) is more meaningful, though even that reflects a self-selected cohort who chose deeper specialisation.
Three years of data at IITM
| Year | Grad | Placed | Rate | Median | Higher studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | 388 | 297 | 77% | ₹17.0L | 78 |
| 2022-23 | 639 | 496 | 78% | ₹16.6L | 96 |
| 2023-24 | 714 | 549 | 77% | ₹17.5L | 153 |
| Year | Grad | Placed | Rate | Median | Higher studies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-22 | 426 | 352 | 83% | ₹18.9L | 65 |
| 2022-23 | 385 | 325 | 84% | ₹17.0L | 41 |
| 2023-24 | 244 | 215 | 88% | ₹19.4L | 24 |
The growing graduate count reflects IITM's expanded intake from earlier years completing their degrees — 388 BTech students graduated in minimum time in 2021-22 vs 714 in 2023-24. This is a system-wide trend, not IITM-specific. The 2022-23 dual-degree median dip to ₹17L appears to be a cohort outlier — likely a higher proportion choosing research roles. The recovery to ₹19.4L in 2023-24 is more consistent with the programme's track record.
IITM vs peers
| Metric | IITM | IITB | IITD | IITK | IITKgp | IITR | IITG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTech placement rate placed ÷ graduated in min. time |
77% | 74% | 75% | 68% | 92% | 64%* | 82%* |
Chose higher studies % of BTech graduates |
21% | 26% | 5% | 25% | 10% | 30% | 22% |
Placed + higher studies |
98% | 100% | 80% | 93% | 102%† | 94%* | 104%*† |
Median BTech salary |
₹17.5L | ₹19.6L | ₹19.1L | ₹19.4L | ₹19.8L | ₹17.5L | ₹19.5L |
Median Dual Degree salary |
₹19.4L | ₹19.3L | ₹24.3L ↑ | — | ₹20.0L | ₹10.0L | — |
† Values above 100% can occur when higher-studies students from a previous cohort are counted in a later graduation year.
Across all top IITs, placements are broadly similar for good students. The differences in these numbers reflect reporting methodology and programme mix far more than actual differences in outcome. We strongly discourage making any college decision purely on placement data — especially NIRF figures, which are not standardised across institutions.
Placement numbers in NIRF data are incomplete.
Different IITs report placements differently to NIRF — assume a 10–20% variation in how these figures are calculated. For IIT Madras specifically, we have compiled the actual verified placement numbers.
Get answers from professors, students and alumni · community.askiitm.com
Let's start with the stereotype: "IIT Madras is a south Indian campus where everyone speaks Tamil and eats idli-dosa all day." The data says otherwise. 81% of BTech students at IITM are from outside Tamil Nadu — that's 4 out of every 5 students coming from a different state entirely. The campus has students from every corner of India: Delhi, UP, Rajasthan, Bengal, Maharashtra. You will find your people, whatever your background.
Now, a note about IIT Bombay's numbers. IITB enrolls 5,164 BTech students across all years vs IITM's 3,589. That 44% larger student body means every absolute number at IITB — total placements, total research papers, total alumni — will look bigger. When you see IITB's placement or research figures, mentally adjust for size before drawing conclusions. Per-student metrics tell a fairer story.
Female enrollment is nearly identical across all top IITs at 19-21%. This is a system-level outcome driven by JEE demographics and supernumerary seat policy — not a campus culture differentiator.
IITKgp's dual-degree intake of 648 includes integrated MSc programmes in science disciplines (Physics, Chemistry, Maths) — structurally different from the BTech+MTech dual degrees at IITM. Keep that in mind when comparing outcomes later.